SEO impact of an iframed blog is very low ? Right or wrong ?
-
We're thinking about adding a blog to our site, but our CMS blogging features are not good.
Someone suggested using a wordpress blog and putting it in an iframe on our site.
I replied that all the SEO impact of our blogging efforts will be lost because of the iframe. I am right or wrong ?
If I am right, could you suggest better alternatives ?
Thanks in advance !
Jean-François Monfette
-
You're welcome,
From what I can tell, 2013 features massive improvements in terms of SEO for publishing pages. I'm not sure about the blog, but I'd be surprised if it wasn't a whole lot better.
-
Thanks a lot for this reply, I really appreciate it !
I will share this information right now with our development team. This will help a lot. Also, we are moving to Sharepoint 2013 in the summer. I hope they have improved their blogging features.
-
Hello,
Your question about iframes has already been answered, but I thought I'd share my experiences with Sharepoint as a blog platform...
I've just spent the past few months building a site in Sharepoint with a blog. We ended up coming up with a couple of different solutions from an SEO perspective...
The biggest issues the out-of-the-box blog in Sharepoint (I'm assumine 2010 or 2007 here) faces are:
- Lack of SEO friendly URLs
- No meta description
- The apparent inability to display an excerpt on the homepage of the blog.
- Horrible horrible commenting system
Unfortunately the blog uses a query to pull the posts from a list, and it's a lot harder to modify than a standard page layout.
We've been testing out two solutions:
- Using an article page for the blog post, a content query web part to roll up these articles on a "blog" page, and then used the Byline field on the article as a way to power both the meta description (I can locate the code for you for that if you want) and the excerpt.
We then created "category" pages which contained another content query web part, which attempted to display all posts that had a certain keyword in them.
Finally, we ditched the Sharepoint comments system altogether, and used Disqus (which was surprisingly easy to add to the blog)
It was pretty clunky, but from a purely SEO perspective, it's working out fine.
- That said, we're unhappy with how clunky it is for internal users, so we're now working with an open source solution that enhances Sharepoint's native blog. http://cks.codeplex.com/releases/view/28520
Just this morning we got it to work with Sharepoint 2010. It covers most of the issues I outlined above (though we're still going to implement disqus) aside from the meta description, which is what I'm set to tackle next.
Hopefully this provides some guidance on where you might be able to go while remaining with Sharepoint.
-
Thank you both for your comments. I marked it as answered since you seem to agree on the point and clarified my thinking that we would not receive the sought after SEO value of blogging by using iframes.
I will share your answers with our team and try to look for a proper way of doing it.
-
Our site use Microsoft Sharepoint as a CMS and the blogging features are not good, as I have heard.
We probably could do bdc.ca/blog, but we would probably have infrastructure issue to mix php pages and apsx pages.
-
To add to my comment, one of the problems with my solution starts when your navigation changes, which it almost always does.
A solution to this is to for example to use a php include statement for the navigation/header from your old CMS in Wordpress and only link to your Wordpress main page from the navigation. Come to think of it, if you have a good programmer he/she can probably also make sure that new Wordpress pages and the navigation thereof can automatically be inserted into the navigation of your old CMS.
In short, you just need a designer/coder to port your current theme to Wordpress and a programmer to make sure the navigation stays the same in both CMS's.
-
right exactly this is what I was trying to say; so essentially the Wordpress page would be indexed and the keyword placement and optimization done by the contents of the blog in the iFrame would not lend credit to the domain but instead to the wordpress site making it less than ideal.
You are correct, sir.
-
In my research iframes do get indexed, only just by their URL and not by the page the iframe was incorporated in.
-
Wordpress itself is indeed an option, but I don't really see why you should an iframe.
It is better to install Wordpress yourself, on your own website in a different directory and put a link in the navigation of the old CMS to the Wordpress directory and have your current theme ported to a Wordpress theme. This way your website will look the same in both your old CMS and Wordpress, as I think this was part of your initial hesitation of not immediately using Wordpress on your own site.
As for SEO impact, that depends on how you look at it. By using an iframe your website does not benefit from the additional content association, but when you link back to your main site from the iframe, that will carry a bit of weight.
But an iframe is definitely not an ideal solution, no.
-
You are correct. The text of the iFrames will not be crawled. However, if you are using the blog simply to gain backlinks then it MIGHT work... keyword "might." depends what people share, the wordpress link or your website link.
Why can't you put the blog on your site? I don't understand this part, my apologies. IMO there's no better place for a blog than yoursite.com/blog
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Non-Existent Parent Pages SEO Impact
Hello, I'm working with a client that is creating a new site. They currently are using the following URL structure: http://clientname.com/products/furry-cat-muffins/ But the landing page for the directory /products/ does not actually have any content. They have a similar issue for the /about/ directory where the menu actually sends you to /about/our-story/ instead of /about/. Does it hurt SEO to have the URL structure set up in this way and also does it make sense to create 301 redirects from /about/ to /about/our-story/?
Technical SEO | | Alder0 -
Moving Blog Question
Site A is my primary site. I created a blog on site B and wrote good content and gave links back to site A. I think this is causing a penalty to occur. I no longer want to update site B and want to move the entire blog and it's content to sitea.com/blog. Is this a good idea or should I just start a fresh/new sitea/blog and just remove the links from site B to site A?
Technical SEO | | CLTMichael0 -
SEO Ultimate Plug in problems for SEO MOZ
Hi Newbee here! SEO ultimate seems to work ok for other url I have on this problem. http://www.pureescapism.co.uk and performing the on page grader for hair salon broadstairsI have canonicalizer on for the plug in and I have made it the rel=canonical targetIt tells me I haven't.Further down I don't get a tick also and am told : Remove all but a single canonical URL tag.Not aware I have more than one.I am also told : No More Than One Meta Description Element ( Cant see how I can do that either as I havent changed any code)Help please
Technical SEO | | Agentmorris0 -
Blog zero PR
Hi I am trying to establish why my main pages on my site has a PR2 but my Blog is PR0. Even though the traffic is spread between the blog and the main site. I also want to get to PR3 but I seem to never get close... Any advise would be very much appreciated...
Technical SEO | | Cocoonfxmedia0 -
Client with Very Very Bad Onsite SEO
So one of my clients has a really really bad website from the technical perspective. I am talking over 75k in violations and warnings. Granted, the tagging is done well but any other SEO violation you can think of is occurring. In any case, they are building a new website, and I am on a retainer for a couple hours a week to do some link building. I am feeling like I am not getting anywhere. What is your advice? Should I keep on keeping on or advice the client to put SEO on hold until the technical issues are resolved. I feel like all of this link building isn't having the value that it could have with a site like this.
Technical SEO | | runnerkik0 -
What are the impact of doing URL Rewriting instead of 301 redirections whille optimizing a blog?
In WordPress, with the ALL In ONE SEO pluggingm we've optimze the permalinks to show more keewords in the URL'. What can be the impact?
Technical SEO | | webit400 -
Site forwarding - seo friendly or not?
Recently i decided to change my domain name - and although i have written several useful and working .htacess files with 301 redirects, this one became more complicated by the fact that I went through TWO domain name changes, before settling on the second one. Having seen some issues with the browser not being able to interpret correctly the .htaccess file, i temporarily suspended the .htaccess file, and opted instead for site forwarding. I don't know the mechanics behind site forwarding, or whether it is seo friendly or just a method for ip addressing, a sort of pseudo domain name server record change.
Technical SEO | | highersourcesites
I let it lie for a few weeks, until the dust settled, and yesterday put back the basic .htaccess file, with a 301 redirect, which directs the original domain name to be forwarded to the new one ( also it has a conditional in place to solve canonical issues). It works fine. But right now i am not seeing the link juice, the domain age, the domain page rank that it has. It has gone to zero, when it used to be three, sometimes four. I also made the change of address using webmaster tools. How long ( forever?) will it take to see my old page rank come back, even if it loses 10% from the change? And does site forwarding help or hinder seo ranking?0